Farookh Mian @ Farooque Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42332 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2019 Thana- HUSSAINGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== Farookh Mian @ Farooque Ahmad, Son of Late Muslim Miyan @ Muslim Mian Resident of Village - Piyaur, P.S. M.H. Nagar, District - Siwan, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prashant Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akhileshwar Dayal, APP For the Informant : Mr. Prakash Chandra Jha, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 23-03-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove all the defects as pointed out by office within two weeks after start of normal functioning of the Court. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. This is the 3rd attempt of the petitioner to obtain bail in connection with Hussainganj P.S. Case No.190 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 302 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act. He is in custody since 08.07.2019. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Earlier vide order dated 15.02.2022, this Court had

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42332 of 2021(3) dt.23-03-2022 2/2 called for a report from the learned trial court with regard to the present stage of the trial and the time likely to be taken in conclusion thereof which has been received as contained in letter no.57 dated 25.02.2022.

Having regard to the report received from the learned trial court as contained in letter no.57 dated 25.02.2022 and on finding that the trial court is awaiting the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and is expecting to conclude the trial within a period of three months only after final order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail at this stage. Prayer for bail is, thus, refused. It is expected from the learned trial court that the trial would be concluded as early as possible on receipt of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and as per direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

This application stands disposed of.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.