Mithilesh Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8368 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.
Mithilesh Paswan Son of late Ramnarayan Paswan Resident of Village Belai P.O. and P.S.-Ghosi, District-Jehanabad.
2.
Sanarik Yadav Son of Late Prayag Yadav Resident of Village Belai P.O. and P.S.-Ghosi, District-Jehanabad.
3.
Arjun Yadav Son of Late Prayag Yadav. Resident of Village Belai P.O. and P.S.-Ghosi, District-Jehanabad.
4.
Sudama Prasad Son of Kapildeo Mahto. Resident of Village Belai P.O. and P.S.-Ghosi, District-Jehanabad.
5.
Shyam Sundar Yadav @ Shyam Sundar Prasad Son of Ajun Yadav Resident of Village Belai P.O. and P.S.-Ghosi, District-Jehanabad. 6.
Shyamnandan Saw Son of Girani Saw. Resident of Village Belai P.O. and P.S.-Ghosi, District-Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioners
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Jehanabad. 2.
The District Magistrate, Jehanabad.
3.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Jehanabad.
4.
The District Revenue Officer, Jehanabad.
5.
The Circle Officer, Ghoshi, Jehanabad.
... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Gyanendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Khurshid Alam, AAG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 19-10-2020 As of now the Courts have not resumed normal physical hearing, the matter has been listed today for consideration through Video Conferencing.
The learned counsels are appearing and making submissions from their residence. The Court Master and Secretary are also part of this virtual court proceedings from their homes, all with the aid of audio visual technology.
Patna High Court CWJC No.8368 of 2020(2) dt.19-10-2020 2/2 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the State.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that he would be availing his remedy under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956.
In view of such submission the writ petition, in presence of learned State Counsel, is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner as aforesaid.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SNkumar/- U