Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Mahato And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.4829 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2018 Thana- DARAUNDA District- Siwan ======================================================
1. Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Mahato, Son of Arjun Mahto
2. Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Mahato Son of Arjun Mahto
3. Anil Kumar @ Anil Mahto Son of Suresh Mahto
4. Pramendar Kumar @ Pramendra Mahato Son of Suresh Mahato
5. Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Mahato Son of Ram Pravesh Mahato
6. Amit Kumar @ Amit Mahato Son of Gaya Mahato All are Residents of Village - Pakwalia, P.S.- Daraunda, District- Siwan ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Javed Aslam For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Sri Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 05-02-2019 The appellants seek pre arrest bail in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 185 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(r), 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act. Allegation against the appellants is of assault to the informant, his father and sister.
It has been submitted on behalf of the appellants that F.I.R itself shows that no specific allegation has been attributed to any of the appellants.
Heard learned Special P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4829 of 2018 dt.05-02-2019 2/2 circumstances of the case, let the appellants, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -Icum-Special Judge Siwan, in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 185 of 2018, subject to the conditions laid down under Sectin 438 (2) of Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, this appeal is allowed and impugned order is set aside.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date