Dr. Sudarshan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.534 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.
Dr. Sudarshan Kumar, The Block Development Officer-cum-Secretary, Block Teacher Employment Committee, Mahnar.
2.
Sri Binda Mahto Aged about 55 year, the Block Education Officer, Mahnar Block, Distt- Vaishali (Cum-Member Block Teacher Employment Committee, Mahnar).
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Dr. Sangeet Sinha The District Education Officer, Vaishali. 3.
Sri Dinesh Kumar Choudhary The District Programme officer Establishment, Vaishali 4.
Smt. Sheela Devi The Block Pramukh, Mahnar block, District- Vaishali 5.
Sri Pramod Kumar Singh The Principal, Govt. Middle School, Rupasipur, Mahnar, Vaishali. ...Opp.Parties/Respondents 6.
Nandeshwar Kumar Son of Late Baleshwar Singh Resident of VillageAshfpur Supaul, P.o- Supaul, Police Station- Patori, Distt- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/ Respondent ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Ashutosh Rnjan Pandey (AAG 15) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) Date : 10-05-2019 While waiving of defect nos. 29 and 106 for the present we allow learned counsel for the appellants to put his initial on the certificate attached to the memo of appeal, during course of the day.
We take up the appeal with consent of the parties for hearing on merits.
Patna High Court L.P.A No.534 of 2019 dt.10-05-2019 2/2 This appeal arises from an order passed by the learned Single Judge in MJC No. 1693 of 2018, whereby direction has been given to opposite party nos. 3, 4 and 5 to be present in Court and to explain why contempt proceeding be not initiated. The direction so given by the learned Single Judge neither constitutes a judgment to maintain an intra-court appeal nor is an order appealable under the provisions of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971.
Mr. Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad, learned counsel for the appellants thus understandably prays for withdrawal of the appeal which is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
(Jyoti Saran, J) ( Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) mrl./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 18/05/2019 Transmission Date N.A.