Mukesh Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.7088 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -21 Year- 2014 Thana -KATIHAR GRP CASE District- KATIHAR ====================================================== Mukesh Mahto Sonof Krishnadeo Mahto Resident of village - Daksin Tola, Dandkhora, P.S. Dandkhora, District - Katihar .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Sah @ Baranwal, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 04-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 457, 380, 411 of IPC. Allegation against the petitioner and others is to have entered into the house of the informant and committed theft. Later on, stolen article has been recovered from the house of the petitioner.
It is submitted that the petitioner has not been put on T. I. Parade. The stolen article has also not been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. However, after investigation charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the witnesses.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7088 of 2015 (2) dt.04-03-2015 2/2 Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has also criminal antecedent.
Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Katihar/court concerned in Rail Thana Kishanganj (Barsoi) P. S. Case No. 21 of 2014 (G. R. No. 78 of 2014) after framing of charge with following conditions:-
1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.
2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.
3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T