Arun Yadav @ Arun Gop v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42579 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-374 Year-2020 Thana- PATNA CITY CHOWK District- Patna ====================================================== ARUN YADAV @ ARUN GOP Son of Late Rama Gop Resident of VillageGhasiyari Tola, Sudarshan Path, Police Station- Chowk, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-01-2022 Heard the parties through video conferencing. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the Pairvikar of the case has not given correct information with respect to the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and as such incorrect statement has been made in Para-3 of the bail petition. The petitioner submits on his own endeavour that the petitioner has been made accused in several other cases, and in such circumstances, he seeks permission to withdraw the application filed on behalf of petitioner.

Law is well settled with regard to false averments in the pleading are sufficient to attract Chapter XI of the I.P.C. In this case Pairvikar of the petitioner has knowingly and deliberately made false statement/information in paragraph No.3 of the present bail application. This practice of having made a false statement incorporated in an affidavit filed before Court should always be deprecated and entail appropriate legal action

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42579 of 2021(3) dt.21-01-2022 2/2 against the accused persons.

In view of the above submission, the application filed on behalf of the petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn. (Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U T