Sanjeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44268 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -481 Year- 2014 Thana -MADHEPURA District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Sanjeev Kumar S/o Rajendra Mandal R/o village- Shankarpatti, P.S.- Chhatapur, District- Supaul.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : M/S Manish Kumar and Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Advocates ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 04-02-2015 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No.481 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 406 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is merely an employee of the concerned institution as would be evident from the F.I.R. itself. All the officials fled away but the petitioner remained there when the team concerned came to enquire into the matter. The petitioner has been named in the First Information Report only on the basis of the fact that he could not produce any permission to run the Bank. It is contended that petitioner being an employee, not the high officials or Member of the Board of Director etc., he was not able to produce any

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44268 of 2014 (2) dt.04-02-2015 2/2 documents. Petitioner claims to be in custody since 28.8.2014. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner namely Sanjeev Kumar be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in Madhepura P.S. Case No.481 of 2014 with a condition that one of the bailors must be his father. Further, if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found to be involved in similar nature of case, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) N.H./- U T