Ravindra Gupta @ Ravindra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34117 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2020 Thana- BRAHMPURA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Ravindra Gupta @ Ravindra Kumar, Son Of Late Kedar Nath Gupta Resident Of Village- Juran Chapra Road No. 4 Near Mazar, Ps- Brahmpura, DisttMuzaffapur ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498, 506, 341, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 125(3)(4) of the Maintenance Act.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of two cases, but in one case the police submitted final form. It is next submitted that the present F.I.R. came to be instituted by the sister of the petitioner (informant) alleging that her 85 years old father died on account of negligence committed by the petitioner and his wife as they deprived and tortured him by not providing food and taking good-care.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34117 of 2023(2) dt.28-06-2023 2/2 submitted that the father of the petitioner was 85 years old and was staying with the petitioner. It is next submitted that it absolutely does not stand to reason that when the father, who lived uptil the age of 85 years, never complained, then why all of a sudden, the informant instituted the present F.I.R.. It is thus submitted that the reason is clear, the issue is of property.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bailbonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Brahmpura P. S. Case No.181 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T