← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9211/2022dismissed

Ranjan Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2023-01-09Mr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9211 of 2022 ====================================================== Ranjan Kumar Paswan Son of Maheshwar Paswan Resident of VillageBabanandpur, P.S.- Birpur, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director Primary School, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate Begusarai.

4.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Begusarai. 5.

The District Education Officer Begusarai.

6.

The Block Education Officer Cheriyabariyarpur, Begusarai. 7.

The Block Education Officer Teghra, Begusarai. 8.

The Secretary Teacher Employment Unit, Khanjahanpur, Block Cheriyabariyarpur, District- Begusarai.

9.

The Secretary Employment Unit, Panchayat Raj Basahi, Block Cheriyabariyarpur, District- Begusarai.

10.

The Secretary Employment Panchayat Raj Adharpur, Block- Teghra, District- Begusarai.

11.

The Secretary Employment Unit, Panchayat Raj Dhankoul, Block- Teghra, District- Begusarai.

12.

The Secretary Employment Unit, Panchayat Raj Gopalpur, BlockCheriyabariyarpur, District- Begusarai. 13.

The Secretary Employment Unit, Panchayat/ Raj Pobail, BlockCheriyabariyarpur, District- Begusarai. 14.

The Secretary Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Vivek Anand Amritesh, AC to SC-28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 09-01-2023

1. Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner by way of this writ petition has prayed as under:- "That the petitioner craves kind

Patna High Court CWJC No.9211 of 2022(3) dt.09-01-2023 2/3 indulgence of this Hon'ble Court for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, directions/directions, order/orders, particularly a writ in the nature of certiorari for the following reliefs:- (i) For quashing the letter memo no. 2259 dated 10.05.2021 (Annexure-5), issued under the signature of respondent no.

4, the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Begusarai, whereby and whereunder the respondent no. 4 has given direction and order to respondent no. 9, the Secretary Employment Unit, Panchayat Raju, Basahi, Block-Cheriyabariyarpur, District- Begusarai to cancel the employment of the petitioner in the allegation of forged T.E.T. Certificate.

(ii) For quashing the letter no. 550 dated 22.09.2021 (Annexure-6), issued under the signature of respondent no. 6, the Block Education Officer, Cheriyabariyarpur, Begusarai whereby and whereunder the respondent no. 6 have given order to the Principals/Incharge Principals of Primary and Middle Schools to give Certificate in regard to removing the names of the teachers from the attendance register and not taking service from them, who have got forged T.E.T. Certificate from invalid Institutions and whose names are mentioned in the list of

Patna High Court CWJC No.9211 of 2022(3) dt.09-01-2023 3/3 the teachers, who have obtained invalid/forged Certificate.

(iii) For any other relief or reliefs, the petitioner is entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case."

3. Earlier too, he has filed a writ petition which was disposed of by this Court on 22.03.2022 granting him liberty to file an appeal before the District Appellate Authority/ State Appellate Authority. He has again filed the present writ petition stating that he had not made the prayer which is presently making in the present petition.

4. Once this Court has already held remedy available to the petitioner to approach the District Appellate Authority/ State Appellate Authority, filing of the present writ petition again making other prayers, which could have been made before the District Appellate Authority / State Appellate Authority, this Court finds the writ petition to be wholly frivolous and is accordingly dismissed.

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Pravinkumar/- Item No. 18 U