Shankar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35078 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2020 Thana- KINJAR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.
Shankar Chaudhary, aged about 30 years, Male Son of Pradeep Chaudhary. 2.
Anil Chaudhary, aged about 30 years, Male Son of Chandradeep Chaudhary. 3.
Chandradip Chaudhary, aged about 52 years, Male Son of Jitan Chaudhary. 4.
Pradeep Chaudhary, aged about 55 years, Male Son of Jitan Choudhary. 5.
Rampravesh Chaudhary, aged about 47 years, Male Son of Jitan Chaudhary. 6.
Ajit Chaudhary, aged about 30 years, Male Son of Rajendra Chaudhary. 7.
Rampyare Chaudhary, aged about 43 years, Male Son of Jitan Chaudhary. All are resident of Village- Ibrahimpur, PS- Kinjar, District- Arwal. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 30-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Kinjar P.S. Case No. 92 of 2020 dated 20.12.2020 instituted for offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 308, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons reached the house of the informant with lathi, danda and iron rod and assaulted the informant and his family members.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35078 of 2023(3) dt.30-08-2023 2/2 they are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioners and informant are co-villagers and there is land dispute between the parties. Injuries to all the injured are simple in nature. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners above named be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1, Arwal in connection with Kinjar P.S. Case No. 92 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Anand Kr.
U T