Nitish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32171 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2020 Thana- PIPRIYA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== NITISH KUMAR Son of Arun Singh Resident of Village- Walipur, P.S.- Pipariya, District- Lakhisarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP .
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 06-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.
2. The petitioner is in custody since 21.06.2020 in connection with Pipariya P.S. Case No. 43 of 2020 for the alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of 198 litres of foreign liquor from a tempo and a brick-kiln and the alleged recovery has not been made from the conscious possession of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32171 of 2020(2) dt.06-01-2021 2/2 petitioner. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.
4. Learned APP appears and has been heard.
5. Be that as it may and having regard to the period of custody already suffered since 21.06.2020, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge 2ndcum- Special Judge (Excise), Lakhisarai in connection with Pipariya P.S. Case No. 43 of 2020, if he is not otherwise required in any other case.
6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
(Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T