← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10583/2019withdrawn

Pinnu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-18Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10583 of 2019 ====================================================== Pinnu Kumar Son of Amber Mahto R/O- Mohalla- Patel Nagar Bhainsasur, P.s. and P.O. - Biharsharif, Distt- Nalanda, presently posted as Headmaster at Middle School Barandi, Rahui, Distt- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

3.

The Director (Primary Education) Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Education Officer District- Nalanda. 5.

The District Program Officer (Establishment) District- Nalanda. 6.

Bihar Rajya Prathmik Shikshak Sangh (Gop Gut) Through Sangathan Sachiv, namely Ratan Gupta, Son of Sri Mishri lal, Resident of MohallaBaignabad, P.S.- Biharsharif, Distt. - Nalanda. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Avanindra Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra (Sc16) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-12-2023

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was aggrieved by the impugned order passed by respondent no. 2 vide its Memo No. 270, dated 15.02.2019, and Memo No. 587, dated 16.04.2019, whereby, posting order issued on the basis of senioritycum-choice of the petitioners on the post of Headmaster contained in Memo No. 1757, dated 05.05.2018, has been cancelled.

2. Learned counsel next submits that Memo No. 1757, dated

Patna High Court CWJC No.10583 of 2019(3) dt.18-12-2023 2/2 05.05.2018, has been given effect in 2018 and pursuant to the impugned order the posting of the petitioners has not been disturbed. The impugned order has been passed by the authority due to some contempt application, bearing MJC No. 4585 of 2018, filed by some teachers before this Court, however, learned counsel submits that at present petitioner is not being disturbed as such he seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty to approach this Court, if in future some disturbance is created by the authorities in posting of the petitioner.

3. Permission is granted.

4. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) ashwani/- U