← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17291/2016dismiss for nonprosecution

Md. Shakil v. The Union Of India And ORS

2024-06-25Justice Smt. G. Anupama Chakravarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17291 of 2016 ====================================================== Md. Shakil Son of Md. Hussain, resident of Manihar Mohalla, Raghonagar, Bhawara, Ward No-23, P.O-Bhawara, P.S-Madhubani Town, DistrictMadhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union Of India through the Secretary, Petroleum and Natural Gas Department, Government of India, New Delhi 2.

The Secretary, Petroleum and Natural Gas Department, Government of India, New Delhi.

3.

The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. through its Managing Director, G-9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg, Bandra Eas 4.

The General Manager, Bihar State Office, Indian Oil Corporation Limited MD, Loknayak Jaiprakash Bh 5.

The Sr. Divisional Retall Sales Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited M.D., Muzaffarpur Division 6.

The Area Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited M.D.,Indian Area Office, Begusarai, Barauni Oil R 7.

The Principal Secretary, Ministry of Shipping Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi.

8.

The Chief Managing Director, National Highway Authority of India, Government of India, New Delhi.

9.

The Project Director, National Highway Authority of India Darbhanga Unit, Darbhanga.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar No 13 For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S.D Sanjay Addl. Soc. Gen.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 25-06-2024 On 03.11.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Again on 20.06.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and as a last indulgence, the matter was ordered to be listed for today i.e. on 25.06.2024.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17291 of 2016(12) dt.25-06-2024 2/2

2. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the present writ application stands dismissed for default.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) amitkr,priyanka/- U