Ranjan Kumar Yadav@ Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34313 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-241 Year-2022 Thana- CHARPOKHARI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.
RANJAN KUMAR YADAV@ RANJAN KUMAR SON OF HARE RAM YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- CHANDI, PS- CHARPOKHARI, DISTT- BHOJPUR 2.
INDRAGEET KUMAR @ BUDHAN PASWAN SON OF BINDESHWAR PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- CHANDI, PS- CHARPOKHARI, DISTT- BHOJPUR ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Md. Ataul Haque For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 03-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, when the informant was returning from the collection of the money from Utkarsh Small Finance Bank from the debit holder customer near Barni High School. Thereafter, three unknown persons came with motorcycle overtake the informant's motorcycle and on the point of gun snatched Rs. 20,446/- and other articles from the informant.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34313 of 2023(3) dt.03-08-2023 2/3
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. They have committed no offence. Petitioners are not named in the FIR and the same has been lodged against unknown persons. The name of the petitioners has come into light, on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Pawan Kumar. On the basis of false recovery shown by the police, petitioners have been implicated in the present case. Nothing incriminating/looted articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He submitted that the trial of this case is triable by learned Judicial Magistrate. They are languishing in judicial custody since 04.01.2023.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submitted that the stolen articles recovered from the possession of the petitioners and it has identified by the informant, which is mentioned in vide para-76 of the case diary.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34313 of 2023(3) dt.03-08-2023 3/3 satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Charphokri P.S. Case No. 241 of 2022.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T