Abhishek Kumar Singh @ Abhishek Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77146 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-559 Year-2018 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran ====================================================== Abhishek Kumar Singh @ Abhishek Kumar S/o Shree Ranjan Patel Resident of Mohalla-Devi Mandir, Club Road Roman P.S.-Mithunpura DistrictMuzaffarpur at Present Mahindra and Mahindra Finance Limited Chapra Branch P.S. Town Distirc-Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Shahnawaz Ali For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2021 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No. 559 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case merely to get him terminated from his present work. He has not committed any crime. No customer has lodged any written complaint against this petitioner.

Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner is named

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77146 of 2018(18) dt.16-11-2021 2/2 accused in the first information report and there are allegations against him of being involved in illegal collection of money. Further, during investigation witnesses have supported the prosecution case. Petitioner, therefore, does not deserve to be granted the privilege of bail. Considering the nature of allegations levelled, the materials available on record and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court does not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The same is, therefore, rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) mcv/- U T