← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48672/2014bail granted

Gobar @ Imamudin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2015-03-03Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48672 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -24 Year- 2014 Thana -DHANAHA District- WESTCHAMPARAN (BETTIAH) ====================================================== Gobar @ Imamudin Ansari, son of Amin Miyan @ Amin Ansari Resident of Village - Dhawahiya, Police Station - Dhanaha, District - West Champaran .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ravi Shankhar Sahay, Mr. Milind Kumar Mishra, Advocates For the State : Mr. Ram Shankar Das (Spl.Pp) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 03-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 341, 342, 323 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that his antecedent is clean and on the basis of some misconception F.I.R. was lodged against him. It is submitted that, from the perusal of the first information report, it appears that the informant did not recognize the petitioner but on the basis of some enquiry made by her from the kids who were playing cricket, his name has figured in the first information report. Petitioner submits that he is in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48672 of 2014 (2) dt.03-03-2015 2 / 2 custody since 25.08.2014.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Gobar @ Imamudin Ansari is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Dhanaha Police Station Case No.24 of 2014 with a condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative of his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Sanjay-II/- U T