Pramila Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32870 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2026 Thana- BARAUNI RAIL P.S. District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

Pramila Devi W/o Ram Dayal Bharit R/o Village- Sahdai, P.S.- Desari, O.P.- Sahdai Buzurg, District- Vaishali 2.

Ganita Devi W/o Tinku Giri R/o Village - Nayangawn, P.S.- Dariyapur, District - Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramhansh Kumar Puri, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 14-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection with Rail Barauni P.S. Case No. 60 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(b) of the NDPS Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that from the possession of petitioner no. 2 altogether, 11.91 gram of brown sugar and from the possession of petitioner no. 1 altogether, 11.41 gram of brown sugar were recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32870 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026 2/2 petitioners has further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of these petitioners. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and police have not complied section 105 of B.N.S.S. while preparing the seizure list. It has further been submitted that alleged recovery of contraband is though more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. Moreover, the petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 23.03.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai in connection with Rail Barauni P.S. Case No. 60 of 2026.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- Sneha/- U T