Ravindra Das @ Rabindra Das @ Ravindra Kumar Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33296 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-766 Year-2024 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Raja Manjhi S/o Late Naresh Manjhi Resident of village- Manpur, Pahartalli, Sarwara Sagar, P.S.- Gaya Muffasil, Distt.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Aryan Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-05-2025 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Gaya Mufassil P.S. Case No. 766 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 310(2), 311, 132, 121(2) and 221 of the B.N.S. Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner and the co-accused persons are of committing dacoity with railway passengers and also of assaulting police personnel and looting motorcycle as well as service revolver of police personnel.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33296 of 2025(2) dt.16-05-2025 2/3 surfaced during the course of investigation. It is further submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is next submitted that the co-accused, namely, Asha Devi, has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 19.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 13422 of 2025. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent and is in custody since 17.02.2025.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the parties and taking into account the fact that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and there is general and omnibus allegation against the all the accused persons, let the petitioner abovenamed, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gaya, in connection with Gaya Mufassil P.S. Case No. 766 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner will remain present on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33296 of 2025(2) dt.16-05-2025 3/3 each and every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the learned Trial Court.
(iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be canceled by the Court concerned.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Sourendra Pandey, J) Jyoti/- U T