Kamani Devi @ Kamini Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46026 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2024 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Kamani Devi @ Kamini Devi W/O of Late Pankaj Das Resident of villageShakhmohan, PS- Bibhutipu, Dist -Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raja Ram Mishra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-08-2025 Heard Mr. Raja Ram Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, learned APP for the State.

2.The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending her arrest in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 177 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 354, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has assaulted with lathi on the hand of Chhoti Devi, due to which her hand was fractured.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46026 of 2025(2) dt.04-08-2025 2/3 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. She has falsely been implicated in this case. He also submits that this case is a counter blast of the case, which was filed by the petitioner, regarding murder of her husband. He next submits that from the bare perusal of the FIR, it is clear that only allegation against the petitioner is that she has assaulted with lathi on the hand, due to which, the hand was fractured. It has lastly been submitted that a statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of her arrest or surrender in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 177 of 2024, she will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Rosera, Samastipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46026 of 2025(2) dt.04-08-2025 3/3 section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T