Renu Saha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9918 of 2020 ====================================================== Renu Saha Wife of Om Prakash Resident of Rajeev Nagar, Road No. 25, POKeshrinagar, Rajeev Nagar- 800024 P.S.- Rajeev Nagar, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Director Administration Cum- Additional Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Director Secondary Education, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
5.
The Accountant General, Bihar.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Brisketu Sharan Pandey, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Shankar Kumar Thakur, AC to GP-27 For the A.G.
:
Mr. Ram Yash Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 10-08-2023 Heard Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Brisketu Sharan Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Shankar Kumar Thakur, learned AC to learned GP-27 appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Ram Yash Singh, learned counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar.
2. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner informs this Court that substantial amount of retiral dues has been paid to the petitioner including sanction of 90 percent gratuity by the concerned authority which required to
Patna High Court CWJC No.9918 of 2020 dt.10-08-2023 2/2 be calculated for fixation of pension and gratuity has also been sanctioned but the same is pending before the Accountant General, Bihar.
3. The Accountant General, Bihar, is directed to forthwith issue authority with respect to the gratuity in favour of the petitioner to the Treasury Officer and, accordingly, the Treasury Officer is directed to forthwith credit the amount into the pensionary account of the petitioner.
4. All the above exercise is directed to be done within a period of two weeks. In case, the Treasury Officer fails to credit the amount into the account of the petitioner, the petitioner is at liberty to take legal action against him.
5. With above observation and direction, the present writ petition is disposed of.
(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/Nilmani AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 11.08.2023 Transmission Date N/A