Ganesh Sah v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.880 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-1999 Thana- KHANPURA District- Samastipur ====================================================== GANESH SAH S/o Late Ram Awtar Sah R/o village- Bawanghat, P.S.- Khanpur, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna Bihar 2.

The State Sentence Remission Board through the Principal Secretary, Home Dept, Government of Bihar Patna, Bihar 3.

The Joint Secretary- cum- Director (Administration), Home Department (Prison), Bihar, Patna Bihar 4.

The Secretary, Law Department , Government of Bihar, Patna Bihar 5.

The Additional Director General of Police, Criminal Investigation Department, Bihar, Patna Bihar 6.

The Inspector General, Jail and Reforms Services, Bihar, Patna Bihar 7.

The Assistant Inspector General Jail and Reforms Services, Bihar, Patna Bihar 8.

The Jail Superintendent, Khudi Ram Bose Central Jail, Muzaffarpur Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Lalit Kishore (Ag) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 17-06-2019 The petitioner has come up for premature release keeping in view the guidelines framed by the respondent-State. The petitioner has been convicted for murder punishable under Section 302 I.P.C. and is undergoing the sentence awarded to him.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.880 of 2019(2) dt.17-06-2019 2/2 Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the petitioner has been found guilty of a gruesome murder which was pre-meditated and clearly organized for which there is no provision for remission.

Be that as it may, let the claim of the petitioner be considered in accordance with law and appropriate orders be passed by the respondent No. 2 keeping in view the guidelines applicable to the controversy expeditiously, preferably by the next meeting of the Remission Board.

The petition is accordingly disposed of.

(Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) K.C.Jha/- U