Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46151/2014bail granted

Raj Dhan Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2015-02-04Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46151 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -272 Year- 2012 Thana -BARH District- PATNA ====================================================== Raj Dhan Rai Son of Sri Mangani Rai Resident of village - Ekauna, Police Station - Simri, District - Buxar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha.Adv For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 04-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 27.04.2014 in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 272 of 2012 for the alleged offences under Section 414 IPC.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated only on the confessional statement of coaccused and he has not named in the FIR as one of the four persons said to be making away with the truck. It is further submitted that the FIR named co-accused Triloki Rai @ Sipahiji has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 33711 of 2013. From perusal of a copy of the relevant bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46151 of 2014 (3) dt.04-02-2015 order dated 20.09.2013 passed in that case, it appears that other three co-accused have also been granted bail by the learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Barh as well.

5. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 272 of 2012 with the following conditions1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.

2. The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court.

4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran U T