Pramod Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34364 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-295 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Madhepura ====================================================== PRAMOD YADAV Son of Ram Sharan Yadav Resident of Village - Katharda, Ward no.8, P.s.- and Distt.- Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 16-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

It is a case of recovery of country made liquor from a Mahendra Supro Mini Truck.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that he has no concern with the seized liquor and vehicle and no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious or constructive possession of the petitioner and petitioner has not been apprehended at the spot. Petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34364 of 2022(2) dt.16-09-2022 2/2 clean antecedent and similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Annexure-2 to this petition.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Madhepura in connection with Excise Case No. 295 of 2020-21, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T