← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34241/2023allowed

Vinod Chandra Kumar @ Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Chandrapal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-11-06Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34241 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2021 Thana- SIGAUDI District- Patna ====================================================== Vinod Chandra Kumar @ Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Chandrapal Yadav Son Of Shiyasharan Yadav @SIYA Sharan Yadav Resident Of Village- Mangalbigha, Ps- Sigori, Distt- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar For the Informant :

Mr. Kahkashan Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused persons ambushed informant's son with an intention to kill him fired three bullets upon him.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34241 of 2023(5) dt.06-11-2023 2/2 specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that it is clear from the injury report that the informant's son has received grievous injury caused by hard and blunt substance and he has not received any firearm injury. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant opposed prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that injury report has not supported the prosecution case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Sigori P.S. Case No. 98 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T