Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37549/2024bail granted

Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-12Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37549 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2022 Thana- MATIHANI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Manish Kumar Son of Sunil Singh R/O village- Maniyapa, P.S.- Maithani, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Braj Bhusan Poddar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Shubhesh Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 323, 341, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that this petitioner has assaulted the informant by means of iron rod on his head. Doctor has found the injury grievous in nature.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that due to dispute over a pathway a free fight took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case. There is no allegation of repetition of blow against the petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedent

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37549 of 2024(2) dt.12-07-2024 2/2 and he is in custody since 13.03.2024. Charge-sheet has already been submitted.

5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submits that the injury caused by this petitioner is grievous in nature.

6. Considering the aforesaid fact that there is no repetition of blow by iron rod against this petitioner, case and counter case and also the fact that petitioner claims clean antecedent and he is in custody since more than four months, prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.- 1st, Begusarai, in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 186/2022. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Ranjeet/- U T