Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38055/2024bail granted

Akhilesh Sahni @ Akhilesh Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-17Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38055 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2024 Thana- KARJA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Akhilesh Sahni @ Akhilesh Sahani Son of Late Anant Sahni @ Anath Sahni R/O Vill.- Arijpur Marwan Khurd, P.S.- Karja, Dist.- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs.Nitu Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Karja P.S. case No. 30 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 272, 273, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 349.2 liters liquor was recovered from the house of the petitioner. The petitioner was arrested on spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38055 of 2024(2) dt.17-05-2024 2/2 has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is further submitted that the recovery is not made from the residential house of the petitioner rather is made from the opposite side of Bhuskar on government road. The petitioner is in custody since 31.01.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Karja P.S. case No. 30 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Pankaj/- U T