← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49168/2014rejected

Sanjay Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2015-03-03Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 49168 of 2014 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -44 Year- 2007 Thana - DARAUNDA District- SIWAN =================================================== Sanjay Prasad S/o Satrughna Prasad Resident of Village - Bagourra, P.S.- Darounda, District - Siwan.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhakar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kr. Roy (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 03.

03.03.2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner, Informant and the State.

The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering that the Petitioner kept absconding for a number of years even while the co-accused were put on trial and convicted, I am not inclined to grant bail to him for the present. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, in the nature of allegations, let the Petitioner, above named be released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49168 of 2014 (3) dt.03-03-2015 Darounda P.S. Case No. 44 of 2007 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail.

(iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T