Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32193/2020bail granted

Shyamu Das v. The State Of Bihar

2021-01-15Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32193 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2020 Thana- KANHAULI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== SHYAMU DAS Son of Laxmi Das Resident of Village - Matiyar Khurd, P.S.- Sahiyara, District - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Virendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 15-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 17.07.2020 in connection with Kanhauli P.S. Case No. 70 of 2020 for the alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of 90 litres of Nepali soufi liquor and the alleged recovery has not been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner claims

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32193 of 2020(3) dt.15-01-2021 2/2 clean antecedents.

4. Learned APP appears and has been heard.

5. Be that as it may and having regard to the period of custody already suffered since 17.07.2020, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J. II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Sitamarhi, in connection with Kanhauli P.S. Case No. 70 of 2020, if he is not otherwise required in any other case.

6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T