Arun Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32374 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2026 Thana- AMDABAD District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.
Arun Ravidas S/o Saryug Ravidas R/o - Nirpur Channi, PS - Amdabad, District - Katihar 2.
Saryug Ravidas S/o Late Baikunth Ravidas R/o - Nirpur Channi, PS - Amdabad, District - Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Amdabad P.S. Case No.41 of 2026 dated 10.02.2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 333, 118(1), 109, 125(b) 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per prosecution case, the accusation against the petitioners is that they they in association with other associates assaulted the Informant's father-in-law by means of sickle due to which he sustained injury on his temporal region.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32374 of 2026(4) dt.24-07-2026 2/3 present case. It is next submitted that the alleged incident is said to have taken place on account of a longstanding land dispute. It is further submitted that the injury allegedly sustained by the father-in-law of the informant has been found to be simple in nature. It is further submitted that, having regard to the fact that he is about 70 years of age, the possibility of the injury having been caused by fall cannot be ruled out. It is also submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners of assaulting the father-in-law of the Informant. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents.
5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that there is nothing specific against the petitioners and the injury caused upon the injured is found to be simple in nature and as also the petitioners having no criminal antecedent, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Amdabad P.S.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32374 of 2026(4) dt.24-07-2026 3/3 Case No.41 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as well as the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document / personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Ajit Kumar, J) rishi/- U T