← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/204/2017dismissed

Sunaina Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna And ORS

2022-09-16Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.204 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== Sunaina Devi Wife of Rajendra Prasad Singh, Resident of Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, Behind Bajaj Auto, P.S.- Patrakar Nagar, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna 2.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

3.

The Superintendent of Police, Patna.

4.

The S.H.O., Patrakar Nagar, P.S., Patna.

5.

The S.H.O., Pirbahore P.S., Patna.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Fazle Karim, AC to SC-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 16-09-2022 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this application.

Mr. Fazle Karim, learned AC to SC-1 for the State is present.

The petitioner in this case is seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to register an FIR against M/s Veltech Solar Power System through its proprietor.

On perusal of the writ application, it appears that the petitioner claims to have sent his written complaint to the S.H.O., Patrakar P.S. and then to the Superintendent of Police but thereafter he has not filed any application under Section 156(3) CrPC in the court below.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.204 of 2017(3) dt.16-09-2022 2/2 In the case of Sakiri Vasu vs. State of U.P. & Ors. reported in AIR 2008 SC 907, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has taken a view that an application under Article 226 of the Constitution filed directly for lodging of the FIR is not to be entertained.

It further appears that the petitioner has lost her interest as no one has appeared today on her behalf. This application is, thus, dismissed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) SUSHMA2/- U T Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.