Basudeo Rai And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.4812 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2018 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ======================================================
1. Basudeo Rai and Ors Son of Late Parikshan Rai
2. Kalyani Kumar @ Kalyan Kr. Son of Basudeo Rai
3. Vikash Kumar Son of Arun Rai
4. Sonu Kumar Son of Arun Rai All Resident of Village - Majhauli, P.S.- Raja Pakar Branti, District - Vaishali ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Smt Usha Kumari No-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 05-02-2019 The appellants seek pre arrest bail in connection with Raja Pakar P.S. Case No. 96 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 353, 383, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 (1)(x) of SC/ST Act. Allegation against the appellants including seventeen F.I.R. named accused and 75 to 100 unknown accused persons is of creating road blockade and abusing the informant and also pelting stones on them.
It has been submitted on behalf of the appellants that large number of persons have been made accused in this case and no specific allegation either of abuse or assaulting the police party, has been attributed to the appellants.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4812 of 2018 dt.05-02-2019 2/2 Heard learned Special P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the appellants, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge -Vaishali, in connection with Raja Pakar P.S. Case No. 96 of 2018, subject to the conditions laid down under Sectin 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. Accordingly, this appeal is allowed and impugned order is set aside.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date