Lalan Das @ Lalan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33973 of 2025 Arising out of PS. Case No.-202 Year-2024 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui ====================================================== Lalan Das @ Lalan, S/o Brahmdeo Ravidas @ Brahmdev Das, Resident of village- Mogalwa, PS- Laxmipur, District- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s:

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 202 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, when the informant was going to Anantpur Bank from Teljhari, on his way, some persons came on a car having covered their face and two persons started assaulting the informant with stick. When informant's colleague came to rescue him, two other persons came out of the car and one of them put the gun on informant's head and snatched informant's mobile, key of bike and Rs.17,750 cash etc. After that, they fled away.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33973 of 2025(2) dt.20-06-2025 2/3 that FIR was registered against unknown persons subsequently it is stated that the name of the petitioner was given by a spy to be involved in the present incident. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no evidence to connect the petitioner with the aforesaid case and no recovery whatsoever has been made from the petitioner. It is lastly submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has clean antecedent and has falsely been implicated at the behest of the police.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamui in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 202 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with corresponding Section 482(2) of BNSS as well as subject to the following conditions:-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33973 of 2025(2) dt.20-06-2025 3/3 (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the learned Trial Court.

(iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be canceled by the Court concerned.

(iv) If the petitioner is found to be engaged in any other incident of similar nature the prosecution shall be at liberty to approach the learned Court below for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

7. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial. (Sourendra Pandey, J) Vikash/- U T