← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13489/2021disposed

Bramhachari Prabhunath Pathak v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-24Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13489 of 2021 ====================================================== Bramhachari Prabhunath Pathak Son of Shri Chandrika Pathak Resident of P.O.- Madkan, P.S.- Hussainganj, District- Siwan, Pin Code- 841226. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

Chancellor of Universities, Raj Bhawan, Patna. 3.

Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Darbhanga through its Registrar.

4.

Vice Chancellor, Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Darbhanga.

5.

Registrar, Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Darbhanga. 6.

Dayanand Ayurvedic Medical College and Hospital, Siwan, through its Governing Body.

7.

Secretary, Governing Body, Dayanand Ayurvedic Medical College and Hospital, Siwan.

8.

Sri Prajapati Tripathi Son of Late Gangadhar Tripathi Resident of Fatehpur, Vijayhata, Doctors Colony, P.O. and P.S.- Siwan, District- Siwan, Pin Code841226. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramadhar Shekhar, Advocate For respondent no.2 :

Mr. Janardan Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Apurva Kumar, Advocate For the University :

Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-03-2025 Heard Mr. Ramadhar Shekhar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Janardan Pd. Singh, learned Senior counsel along with Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Kr. Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no.2; Mr. Apurva Kumar, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned counsel for the University.

Patna High Court CWJC No.13489 of 2021(3) dt.24-03-2025 2/2

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the Central Council of Indian Medicine, New Delhi is the necessary party and the said body has not been impleaded in the present writ petition.

3. In view of the fact that the petitioner has remedy before the Central Council of Indian Medicine, New Delhi, the present writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to avail remedy before the Central Council of Indian Medicine in accordance with law for the relief, as sought for in the present writ petition.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U