Vinod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10138 of 2016 ====================================================== Vinod Kumar, son of Biggu Ram, resident of Village Thatheribazar, P.S. Buxar, District Buxar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Joint Director, Agriculture Statistics, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Collector, Rohtas (Sasaram).

5. The Addl. Collector, Rohtas (Sasaram).

6. The Sub-divisional Officer, Sasaram, Rohtas. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suraj Narain Yadav For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ram Balak Mahto, AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-07-2016 The petitioner seeks quashing of the Memo No. 5602, dated 24.05.2016, whereby he has been put under suspension in contemplation of departmental inquiry.

Learned counsel submits that on very vague and general allegations, the petitioner has been put under suspension. I find that this writ application, seeking quashing of the order of suspension, is premature, as there is still sometime for initiating proceeding against the petitioner. In case no charges are framed or any proceeding is initiated against the petitioner within

Patna High Court CWJC No.10138 of 2016 (2) dt.11-07-2016 2/2 the period of three months from the date of order of suspension, the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the same. With the observation aforesaid, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.) kunal/- U