Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47244/2014bail granted

Santosh Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2015-02-04Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47244 of 2014 (2) dt.04-02-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47244 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -191 Year- 2014 Thana -DARIYAPUR District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Santosh Sahni S/o Late Sonelal Sahni resident of village Larua Banbira, P.S. Musari Gharari, Dist - Samastipur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tilak Sao For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Kr.Pandey(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 04-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 191 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioner and co-accused Akchhay Kumar Singh were caught with 50 kg. Copper wire (coir) and some tools and it is submitted that co-accused Akchhay Kumar Singh has been allowed bail by another Bench of this Court vide order dated 5.11.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 41083 of 2014. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner was caught raid handed along with co-accused.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47244 of 2014 (2) dt.04-02-2015 In the facts and circumstances stated above and considering the fact that co-accused has been allowed bail, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri P. K. Chaudhary, J. M. Ist Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 191 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T