Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43668/2021bail rejected

Barud Kumar Urawn @ Barda Urawn v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-24Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43668 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-453 Year-2020 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== BARUD KUMAR URAWN @ BARDA URAWN Son of Suren Urawn Resident of Village - Birpur, P.S. - Muffasil, District - Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 24-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 363, 366A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, the five named accused persons including the petitioner herein are stated to have kidnapped the daughter of the informant for the purpose of marriage.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The daughter of the informant returned and was medically examined where she was assessed by the doctor to be a major. It is further submitted that the main allegation even as per the statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. is against Sunil Uraon and not the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43668 of 2021(3) dt.24-03-2022 2/2 petitioner herein who is in custody since 10.3.2021 and has no criminal antecedent. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. of the daughter of the informant, it transpires that the petitioner was actively involved with the co-accused Sunil Uraon in kidnapping of the daughter of the informant and as such, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T