Uday Rai @ Sunil Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15387 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -158 Year- 2014 Thana -PANAPUR DistrictSARAN ====================================================== Uday Rai @ Sunil Rai S/o Dudh Nath Rai resident of Village- Bhadhichak Dihi, P.s- Maker, District- Saran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dashrath Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 03-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 17 of C. L. A. Act. Allegation against the petitioner is that he has confessed his guilt before the police regarding involvement in several cases and Maoist purcha/literature has been recovered from his possession.

It is submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 2.12.2014.

Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has also criminal antecedents of similar nature. After investigation the case has been found true and charge-sheet has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15387 of 2015 (2) dt.03-06-2015 2/2 already been submitted.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chapra /court concerned in Panapur P. S. Case No. 158 of 2014 after framing of charge with following conditions:-

1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.

2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T