Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32300/2025bail granted

Rakesh Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-24Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32300 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2022 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVaishali ====================================================== Rakesh Sinha S/O Ganesh Sinha R/O Village- Navanagar, P.S- Bidupur, Dist.- Vaishali at Hajipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Amika Kumari W/O Rakesh Sinha R/O Village- Navanagar, P.S- Bidupur, Distt.- Vaishali at present D/O Ajay Prasad @ Ajay Kumar R/O Jadhua Pokhrea, Pureani Durga Asthan, P.S- Hajipur Nagar, Distt.- Vaishali. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Poonam Kumari, Adv.

Mr.Brahmaputra Singh, Adv.

For the State :

Mr.Kanhiya Kishor, APP For OP No. 2 :

Ms.Shyama Rani, Adv.

Mr.Avadhesh Kr. Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for O.P. No. 2.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with ABP No. 3125 of 2024 arising out of Complaint Case No. 156 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 313, 307, 498(A), 379, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.

3. It is a case of matrimonial dispute.

4. Vide order dated 13.08.2025, the matter was referred to the Patna High Court Mediation and Conciliation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32300 of 2025(5) dt.24-11-2025 2/3 Centre. The report of the learned Mediator dated 07.10.2025 shows that the matter could not be resolved between the parties and therefore, the mediation failed.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. He is a person of clean antecedent. On query of the Court, he has submitted that the petitioner is a labourer and he may pay Rs. 3,000/- per month as maintenance to opposite party no. 2.

6. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, especially the fact that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 3,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 156 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

8. The petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 3,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2 (the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32300 of 2025(5) dt.24-11-2025 3/3 complainant). The interim maintenance will be subject to any other order granted by any other Court of competent jurisdiction granting maintenance to Opposite Party No. 2 (the complainant).

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U T