← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/116/2018disposed

Ashok Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-08-14Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.116 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Ashok Kumar son of Late Basudeo Ram, Resident of Jhaua Kothi, Quarter No. 53, Bari Khanjarpur, Bhagalpur.

2.

Pramod Kumar Ray son of late Devendra Ray, Resident of Kathalbari, Bari Khanjarpur, Bhagalpur.

3.

Om Prakash son of late Shyam Sunder Bhagat, Resident of Kutubganj, Raghu Sah Lane, Mirjanhat, Bhagalpur.

4.

Sachidanand Rajak son of Late Gore Lal Rajak, Resident of B M C Lane, Barari, Bhagalpur.

5.

Shashi Kant Mandal son of Late Sitaram Mandal, Resident of PWD Campus, Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Superintending Engineer, Road Construction Department, East Bihar Circle, Bhagalpur.

4.

The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, East Road Division, Bhagalpur.

5.

The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anjani Kumar Jha, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.U.S.S.Singh -GP-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 14-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioners submit that their case is squarely covered by the judgment and order passed in C.W.J.C. No.18919 of 2017, Arvind Kumar Sinha vs. the State of Bihar and others.

Patna High Court CWJC No.116 of 2018(4) dt.14-08-2019 2/2 The concerned authority will examine the fact, law and relief sought for in the present case vis-a-vis fact, law and relief of C.W.J.C. No.18919 of 2017 and if it is found that the everything is identical, the petitioner would be granted the same relief as has been given to Arvind Kumar Sinha. With the above observation and direction, this application is disposed of.

The counsel for the petitioners has also pointed that in the order dated 11.09.2018 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 18919 of 2017, the letter dated 06.06.2016 has wrongly been typed in place of letter dated 06.06.2017.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U