Dr. Lalan Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6602 of 2017 ====================================================== Dr. Lalan Prasad Yadav son of late Ramugrah Prasad Yadav resident of Chota Telpa, Gandhi Chowk, P.S. - Town Chapra, P.O. - Chhapra, District - Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

Jai Prakash University, Chapra through its Registrar. 3.

The Vice Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chhapra. 4.

The Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chhapra. 5.

The Secretary, Law Department-cum-Ex-Office Member Secretary, the State Level Empowered Committee u 6.

The Principal Secretary, the Education Department-cum-Chairman, the Department Level Empowered Comm 7.

Babasaheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur through its Registrar.

8.

The Vice Chancellor Babasaheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

9.

The Registrar, Babasaheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Verma For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar (GA 9) For the University :

Mr. Bindhyachal Railways :

Mr. Chandan Kumar-Gp17 For the BRA Bihar University :

Mr. Indrajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-06-2024

1. Learned counsel for the University submits that all the payments have been made to the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that his client is not in a good health and is not able to give him instruction, however, liberty may be given to the petitioner to raise the issue of calculation if something

Patna High Court CWJC No.6602 of 2017(8) dt.24-06-2024 2/2 wrong is found by the petitioner.

3. Taking into consideration the fact that the payments have been made to the petitioner, this writ application is disposed with a liberty to the petitioner to raise a grievance with regard to calculation if it is found by him that the correct calculation has not been done by the respondents while making payments to the petitioner.

4. Accordingly, the present writ application is disposed with the aforesaid liberty.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) HarshPandey/- U