Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32162/2026bail rejected

Guddu Sah @ Guddu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-08Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32162 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2024 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Guddu Sah @ Guddu Kumar S/o Late Shyam Sundar Sah Resident of Village- Purnahiya, P.S.- Ghyorasahan, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dewanand Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 70 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 376, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier, vide order dated 15.10.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 51041 of 2025, regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court considering the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 11.05.2025 without any rhymes or reason. He further submits that cognizance has been taken on 04.07.2025 and charges have been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32162 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026 2/2 framed on 16.12.2025 but no any witness has been examined by the learned Trial Court in this case.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail.

6. There is no fresh ground to consider the bail petition of the petitioner.

7. In view of the above, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is again rejected with a direction to the court below to expedite the trial and conclude the same expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from today. If the trial is not concluded within the period of six months, as stated above, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer before the court below.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T