Nathuni Kharwar @ Nathun Kharwar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18951 of 2017 ====================================================== Nathuni Kharwar @ Nathun Kharwar Son of Late Jagmohan Singh @ Jagmohan Kharwar @ Ramjee Kharwar, Resident of Village- Jahanabad, P.O. and P.S.- Kudra, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
The Director of Consolidation, Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Joint Director of Consolidation, Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Deputy Director of Consolidation, Rohtas at Sasaram. 5.
The Consolidation Officer, Kudra, Kaimur at Bhabhua. 6.
Most. Kaushalya Kuer, widow of Late Jagmohan Singh Jagmohan Kharwar, Resident of Village- Jahanabad, P.O. and P.S.- Kudra, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.
7.
CHinta Devi, Daughter of Late Jagmohan Singh @ Jagmohan Kharwar and wife of Satsang Singh, Resident of Village and P.S.- Durgawati, DistrictKaimur at Bhabhua. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Subhash Chandra Yadav -Gp-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 24-06-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though learned counsel for the State is present.
2.The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:
(i) for issuance of appropriate writ or writs / order or orders / direction or directions for setting aside the order dated 12.07.2017 passed by Sri K.P.
Patna High Court CWJC No.18951 of 2017(4) dt.24-06-2025 2/2 Ramaiah, Member, Administrative, Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna in B.L.T.
Case No. 812 of 2016 with B.L.T.
Case No. 813 of 2016 with B.L.T.
Case No. 841 of 2016 [Most.
Kaushalaya Kuer & ors. VS. The State of Bihar & Ors.] whereby and where under the application was allowed with out considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also for grant of any other relief or reliefs, if the petitioner is found entitled to.
3. For want of prosecution, the writ petition is dismissed.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U