← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31458/2019dismissed

Krishna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-23Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31458 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2019 Thana- BIHARSHARIF District- Nalanda ====================================================== KRISHNA KUMAR S/o Thakur Prasad R/o Mohalla- Bichali Khandak, Ganesh Gali, P.S.- Bihar, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Neha Kumari D/o Bhola Sao R/o village- Daruara, Post- Daruara, P.S.- Noorsarai, District- Nalanda ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bihar P.S.Case No.61/10 registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 504, 307, 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 34 of the D.P.Act. Allegation against the petitioner is that for the demand of Rs.01 lac as dowry, the complainant was subjected to cruelty and they also tried to set her on fire. In this case she was again taken to her Sasural by the petitioner but again she was subjected to torture and assault and for that another complaint petition has been filed.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31458 of 2019(3) dt.23-07-2019 2/2 that he is ready to keep her with dignity and care, whereas submission of the leaned counsel for O.P.no.2 is that in situation where she was subjected to cruelty and assault, she is not ready to reside with the petitioner and further interested for one time settlement.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, however, the petitioner may surrender and pray for regular bail. With the aforesaid direction, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T