Rohit Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35637 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2025 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
Rohit Sharma S/o Late Baduri Sharma R/o Village - Marojhiya, P.S. - Nasriganj, Dist. - Rohtas.
2.
Bidya Sagar @ Bidya Sagar Singh @ Bidha Sagar S/o Umesh Singh R/o Village - Marojhiya, P.S. - Nasriganj, Dist. - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-06-2026 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through virtual mode.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Nasriganj P.S. Case No. 119 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 190, 171(3), 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 352, 299 of the BNS.
3. FIR has been instituted against 20 named accused persons along with 20-25 unknown persons with an allegation of causing assault to the informant and his family members due to which they sustained serious injuries.
4.Learned Advocate for the petitioners submitted that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35637 of 2026(2) dt.01-06-2026 2/3 save and except the omnibus nature of allegation against all the FIR named accused persons, including the petitioners, there is no material that the petitioners have anyhow actively participated in the crime. Moreover, the injuries which are allegedly sustained to the informant and his family members appear to be simple in nature. To support the aforesaid contention, specific averment has been made in para-9 of the bail application. It has further been clarified that there are some mistake of fact in the impugned order and in fact the petitioners have never been arrested but due to mistake of the learned counsel for the petitioners, ABP No. 475 of 2025 was withdrawn as dismissed by showing that the petitioners have been arrested. The petitioners are though accused in connection with Nasriganj P.S. Case No. 117 of 2025, however they submit before the Court that they will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the court.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioners have actively participated in the crime.
6. Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the omnibus nature of allegation, coupled with the fact that the informant and his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35637 of 2026(2) dt.01-06-2026 3/3 family members have sustained simple injuries, as has been disclosed in para-9 of the bail application, let the petitioners abovenamed be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Nasriganj P.S. Case No. 119 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioners. (Harish Kumar, J) Anjani/- U T