Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39518/2023bail rejected

Bikky Singh @ Vikki Singh @ Vikash Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-22Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39518 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-236 Year-2020 Thana- MANIHARI District- Katihar ====================================================== BIKKY SINGH @ VIKKI SINGH @ VIKASH SINGH Son of Bhupati Singh Resident - Nawabganj, P.S.- Manihari, District - Katihar, Bihar - 854113 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Prabhakar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 22-09-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with S.T. no.219/2020 arising out of Manihari P.S. Case no.236 of 2020 registered under sections 302, 307, 324, 326, 447 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide orders dated 2.9.2021 and 23.11.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. no.12489 of 2021 and Cr. Misc. no.50100 of 2022 respectively.

4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with the others are said to have come variously armed and having resorted to indiscriminate firing resulting in death of the informant's brother.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39518 of 2023(5) dt.22-09-2023 2/2

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The allegations are general and omnibus in nature. He is in custody since 8.12.2020 and his case stands on a similar footing to that of co-accused Jichhu @ Ahmad who has been enlarged on bail.

6. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation of the petitioner along with the others having resorted to indiscriminate firing resulting in death of the informant's brother together with the witnesses in course of trial having supported the prosecution case and as is evident from the report received from the learned trial Court which is to the effect that 9 out of 10 chargesheeted witnesses having examined, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T