Anil Mirdha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31419 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2017 Thana- BAUNSI District- Banka ====================================================== ANIL MIRDHA, aged 40 years (Male), Son of Late Rameshwar Mirdha, Resident of Village- Sugana Bathan, Police Station- Bounsi, District- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Mukherjee For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 394, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier, the bail application of the petitioner was rejected on 11.04.2018 vide Annexure-1, with a direction to the trial court to conclude the trial preferably within one year. It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 16.10.2017.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with S.T. No.55/18 arising out of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31419 of 2019(2) dt.15-05-2019 2/2 Bounsi P.S. Case No. 231/2017, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T