Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36266/2024rejected

Pappu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-31Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36266 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-451 Year-2023 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== Pappu Kumar S/O Umesh Rai R/O Village- Pachbhiria P.S. Garkha DistrictSaran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 31-07-2024 Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bharat Lal, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 451 of 2023, F.I.R. dated 25.07.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 324, 325, 326, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. According to prosecution case, petitioner has assaulted on the head, nose and tooth of the informant due to which he received injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36266 of 2024(3) dt.31-07-2024 2/2 petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, on the other hand, on the basis of the materials available on the record in the case diary has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted to the informant and injury report of the informant suggests that the injury is grievous in nature.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 451 of 2023 pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M., IV, Saran at Chapra.

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) ajay/- U T