Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34041 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-546 Year-2021 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== MANOJ KUMAR @ MANOJ YADAV Son of Baldeo Yadav Resident of Village - Karhara, P.s.- Ghosi, Distt.- Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 24-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Ghoshi P.S. Case no. 546 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the FIR, the informant Ramashray Yadav who is the maternal uncle of the deceased alleged that the petitioner along with co-accused killed informant's Bhagini by assaulting with lathi and dead body of the deceased has been cremated.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has got no criminal antecedent. He is falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that when the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34041 of 2022(2) dt.24-11-2022 2/2 informant knew the fact that the deceased was suffering from some mental problems and due to that she was facing several physical problems, he filed a petition before concerned court that due to pain in chest the deceased died and this case has been filed by him mistakenly and matter has been compromised between the parties which is annexed as Annexure 2 series. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Ghoshi P.S. Case no. 546 of 2021, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M. Jehanabad subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U T