Lal Babu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32734 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2019 Thana- CHENARI District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Lal Babu Paswan Son of Dular Paswan Resident of Village- Ugahni, P.S.- Chenari, District- Rohtas.

2.

Sushila Devi Wife of Lal Babu Paswan Resident of Village- Ugahni, P.S.- Chenari, District- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER 17-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Chenari P.S. Case No. 42 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Minor daughter of the informant is said to have been kidnapped by Bablu Paswan along with 3-4 unknown miscreants by Wagon R car. Petitioners, who happen to be parents of Bablu Paswan had earlier assured to get his girl returned, but in vain and on insistence, they slated the informant.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32734 of 2019(2) dt.17-05-2019 2/2 petitioners that the petitioners have no concern with the aforesaid occurrence. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case merely because they happen to be parents of Bablu Paswan, who is said to have kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant. There is no role of petitioners in the kidnapping. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

On the other hand, learned APP opposed the bail prayer of the petitioners.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M-II, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Chenari P.S. Case No. 42 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J) rohit/- U T