Patna High CourtCR. MISC./812/2016bail granted

Satyamjee @ Commando v. The State Of Bihar

2016-03-09Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.812 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -110 Year- 2012 Thana -IMAMGANJ District- GAYA ====================================================== Satyamjee @ Commando, son of Jagdish Yadav, resident of VillageSagdiha, P.S. Roshanganj, Dist- Gaya..... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S. Jamil Akhtar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Nr. Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 09-03-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Imamganj P.S. Case No. 110 of 2012 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 353, 124(A), 506 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3/4/5 Explosive Substance Act, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act Allegedly, the petitioner is named in the First Information Report along with others on the basis that the extremists were calling their associates by taking their names and in this case similarly situated co-accused Rekha Jee, Chhotu Das, Bhutali Ji, Chanarik Ravidas have also been granted bail by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court. The petitioner is suffering in custody since 03.03.2015 having some criminal antecedents.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.812 of 2016 (3) dt.09-03-2016 2/2 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Abhay Srivastava, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Imamganj P.S. Case 110 of 2012, subject to conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Rajiv/- U T